<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should there be a Prediction Market Institute?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/</link>
	<description>Musings of a computer scientist on predictions, odds, and markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pennock</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/?p=313#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Oops, a clarification: I meant one could ask &quot;Should there be a Prediction Institute?&quot;. I agree a Prediction Institute does not imply market-based, and that prediction and forecasting are roughly the same.

I was saying that in a way there already is a &quot;Prediction Institute&quot; and its called the “International Institute of Forecasters”.

I was thinking out loud whether the word &quot;Prediction&quot; is too broad. Then again, Chris Masse makes sense when he argues that the organization can keep &quot;market&quot; out of the name and still have a pretty heavy emphasis on markets and related &quot;crowd wisdom&quot; techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, a clarification: I meant one could ask &#8220;Should there be a Prediction Institute?&#8221;. I agree a Prediction Institute does not imply market-based, and that prediction and forecasting are roughly the same.</p>
<p>I was saying that in a way there already is a &#8220;Prediction Institute&#8221; and its called the “International Institute of Forecasters”.</p>
<p>I was thinking out loud whether the word &#8220;Prediction&#8221; is too broad. Then again, Chris Masse makes sense when he argues that the organization can keep &#8220;market&#8221; out of the name and still have a pretty heavy emphasis on markets and related &#8220;crowd wisdom&#8221; techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/?p=313#comment-432</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. Why does a &quot;Prediction Institute&quot; imply a market based mechanism? I think predicting and forecasting are roughly the same thing. Markets are but one means of predicting or forecasting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. Why does a &#8220;Prediction Institute&#8221; imply a market based mechanism? I think predicting and forecasting are roughly the same thing. Markets are but one means of predicting or forecasting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pennock</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/?p=313#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Fair enough: One could ask the same question about a &quot;Prediction Institute&quot;.

It&#039;s not necessarily about value but about where to focus.

Note there already is an &quot;International Institute of Forecasters&quot; and it even has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/PM/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Special Interest Group on Prediction Markets&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough: One could ask the same question about a &#8220;Prediction Institute&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily about value but about where to focus.</p>
<p>Note there already is an &#8220;International Institute of Forecasters&#8221; and it even has a <a href="http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/PM/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Special Interest Group on Prediction Markets&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2009/03/11/should-there-be-a-prediction-market-institute/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/?p=313#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Where does this leave non market based mechanisms? Do they have no value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does this leave non market based mechanisms? Do they have no value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
