<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oddhead Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.oddhead.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a computer scientist and Yahoo on prediction markets, gambling, and estimating the odds of everything</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Call for Papers and Participation: Workshop on Prediction Markets: Chicago, July 9 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-prediction-markets-chicago-july-9-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-prediction-markets-chicago-july-9-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		
	<category>prediction markets</category>
	<category>research</category>
	<category>events</category>
	<category>economics</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-prediction-markets-chicago-july-9-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am happy to announce the following prediction market workshop and solicit submissions and participants.


=======================================================================
Call for Contributions and Participation
Third Workshop on Prediction Markets
http://betforgood.com/events/pm2008/index.html
Afternoon of July 9, 2008
Chicago, Illinois
In conjunction with the
ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC&#8217;08)
SUBMISSIONS DUE May 23, 2008
=======================================================================

  We solicit research contributions, system demonstrations, and
participants for the Third Workshop on Prediction Markets, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to announce the following prediction market workshop and solicit submissions and participants.<br />
<font face="Courier New"><br />
<center><br />
=======================================================================<br />
Call for Contributions and Participation</p>
<p>Third Workshop on Prediction Markets</p>
<p><a href="http://betforgood.com/events/pm2008/index.html">http://betforgood.com/events/pm2008/index.html</a></p>
<p>Afternoon of July 9, 2008<br />
Chicago, Illinois</p>
<p>In conjunction with the<br />
<a href="http://www.sigecom.org/ec08/">ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC&#8217;08)</a></p>
<p>SUBMISSIONS DUE May 23, 2008<br />
=======================================================================<br />
</center></p>
<p>  We solicit research contributions, system demonstrations, and<br />
participants for the Third Workshop on Prediction Markets, to be held<br />
in conjunction with the Ninth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce<br />
(EC&#8217;08). The workshop will bring together researchers and<br />
practitioners from a variety of relevant fields, including economics,<br />
finance, computer science, and statistics, in both academia and<br />
industry, to discuss the state of the art today, and the challenges<br />
and prospects for tomorrow in the field of prediction markets.</p>
<p>  A prediction market is a financial market designed to elicit a<br />
forecast. For example, suppose a policymaker seeks a forecast of the<br />
likelihood of an avian flu outbreak in 2009. She may float a security<br />
paying $1 if and only if an outbreak actually occurs in 2008, hoping<br />
to attract traders willing to speculate on the outcome. With<br />
sufficient liquidity, traders will converge to a consensus price<br />
reflecting their collective information about the value of the<br />
security, which in this case directly corresponds to the probability<br />
of outbreak. Empirically, prediction markets often yield better<br />
forecasts than other methods across a diverse array of settings.</p>
<p>  The past decade has seen a healthy growth in the field, including a<br />
sharp rise in publications and events, and the creation of the Journal<br />
of Prediction Markets. Academic work includes mechanism design,<br />
experimental (laboratory) studies, field studies, and empirical<br />
analyses. In industry, several companies including Eli Lilly, Corning,<br />
HP, Microsoft, and Google have piloted internal prediction<br />
markets. Other companies, including ConsensusPoint, InklingMarkets,<br />
InTrade, and NewsFutures, base their business on providing public<br />
prediction markets, prediction market software solutions, or<br />
consulting services. The growth of the field is reflected and fueled<br />
by a wave of popular press articles and books on the topic, most<br />
prominently Surowiecki&#8217;s &#8220;The Wisdom of Crowds&#8221;.</p>
<p>Workshop topics<br />
===============</p>
<p>  The area of prediction markets faces challenges regarding how best<br />
to design, deploy, analyze, implement, and understand prediction<br />
markets. One important research direction is designing mechanisms for<br />
prediction markets, especially for events with a combinatorial outcome<br />
space. Another notable issue is manipulation in prediction<br />
markets. Understanding the effect of manipulation is especially<br />
important for prediction markets to find their way to assist<br />
individuals and organizations in making critical decisions. Moreover,<br />
how to implement market mechanisms that not only are easy to use but<br />
also facilitate information aggregation has been an important problem<br />
for practitioners. Prediction markets face social and political<br />
obstacles including antigambling laws and moral and ethical concerns,<br />
both real and constructed.</p>
<p>  Submissions of abstracts for research contributions from a rich set<br />
of empirical, experimental, and theoretical perspectives are<br />
invited. Topics of interest at the workshop include, but are not<br />
limited to:</p>
<p>  * Mechanism design<br />
  * Game-theoretic analysis of mechanisms, behaviors, and dynamics<br />
  * Decision markets<br />
  * Combinatorial prediction markets<br />
  * Market makers for prediction markets<br />
  * Manipulation and prediction markets<br />
  * Order matching algorithms<br />
  * Computational issues of prediction markets<br />
  * Liquidity and thin markets<br />
  * Laboratory experiments<br />
  * Empirical analysis<br />
  * Prediction market modeling<br />
  * Industry and field experience<br />
  * Simulations<br />
  * Policy applications and implications<br />
  * Internal corporate applications<br />
  * Legal and ethical issues</p>
<p>  Submissions of summaries for demonstrations on prediction market<br />
systems are invited. Systems of interest at the workshop include, but<br />
are not limited to:</p>
<p>  * Implemented combinatorial prediction markets<br />
  * Mature systems and commercial products of market mechanisms<br />
  * Research prototypes on prediction markets<br />
  * Other collective prediction systems</p>
<p>Submission instructions<br />
=======================</p>
<p>  Research contributions should report new (unpublished) research<br />
results or ongoing research. We request an abstract not exceeding one<br />
page for every research contribution.</p>
<p>  For system demonstrations, a summary of up to two pages including<br />
technical content to be demonstrated is requested. Please indicate if<br />
the demonstration requires network access.</p>
<p>  Research contributions and system demonstrations should be submitted<br />
electronically to the organizing committee at pm2008@umich.edu no<br />
later than midnight Hawaii time May 23, 2008.</p>
<p>  At least one author of each accepted research contribution and<br />
system demonstration will be expected to attend and present or<br />
demonstrate their work at the workshop.</p>
<p>Important dates<br />
===============</p>
<p>  May 23, 2008: Submissions due midnight Hawaii Time</p>
<p>  May 30, 2008: Notification of accepted research contributions and<br />
  system demonstrations</p>
<p>  July 9, 2008: Workshop date</p>
<p>Organizing committee<br />
====================</p>
<p>  Yiling Chen, Yahoo! Inc<br />
  David Pennock, Yahoo! Inc<br />
  Rahul Sami, University of Michigan<br />
  Adam Siegel, Inkling Markets</p>
<p>More information<br />
================</p>
<p>  For more information or questions, visit the workshop website:<br />
  <a href="http://betforgood.com/events/pm2008/index.html">http://betforgood.com/events/pm2008/index.html</a></p>
<p> or email the organizing committee: pm2008@umich.edu<br />
</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-prediction-markets-chicago-july-9-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Papers and Participation: Workshop on Ad Auctions: Chicago, July 8-9 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-ad-auctions-chicago-july-8-9-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-ad-auctions-chicago-july-8-9-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		
	<category>research</category>
	<category>advertising</category>
	<category>events</category>
	<category>economics</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-ad-auctions-chicago-july-8-9-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am happy to announce the following ad auctions workshop and solicit submissions and participants.


=======================================================================
Call for Papers
Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions
http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/
July 8-9, 2008
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SUBMISSIONS DUE MAY 11, 2008
In conjunction with the
ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC&#8217;08)
=======================================================================

 We solicit submissions for the Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions, to be
held July 8-9, 2008 in Chicago in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to announce the following ad auctions workshop and solicit submissions and participants.<br />
<font face="Courier New"><br />
<center><br />
=======================================================================<br />
Call for Papers</p>
<p>Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions<br />
<a href="http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/">http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/</a></p>
<p>July 8-9, 2008<br />
Chicago, Illinois, USA</p>
<p>SUBMISSIONS DUE MAY 11, 2008</p>
<p>In conjunction with the<br />
<a href="http://www.sigecom.org/ec08/">ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC&#8217;08)</a><br />
=======================================================================<br />
</center></p>
<p> We solicit submissions for the Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions, to be<br />
held July 8-9, 2008 in Chicago in conjunction with the ACM Conference<br />
on Electronic Commerce. The workshop will bring together researchers<br />
and practitioners from academia and industry to discuss the latest<br />
developments in advertisement auctions and exchanges.</p>
<p> In the past decade we&#8217;ve seen a rapid trend toward automation in<br />
advertising, not only in how ads are delivered and measured, but also<br />
in how ads are sold. Web search advertising has led the way, selling<br />
space on search results pages for particular queries in continuous,<br />
dynamic &#8220;next price&#8221; auctions worth billions of dollars annually.</p>
<p> Now auctions and exchanges for all types of online advertising &#8211;<br />
including banner and video ads &#8212; are commonplace, run by startups and<br />
Internet giants alike. An ecosystem of third party agencies has grown<br />
to help marketers manage their increasingly complex campaigns.</p>
<p> The rapid emergence of new modes for selling and delivering ads is<br />
fertile ground for research from both economic and computational<br />
perspectives. What auction or exchange mechanisms increase advertiser<br />
value or publisher revenue? What user and content attributes<br />
contribute to variation in advertiser value? What constraints on<br />
supply and budget make sense? How should advertisers and publishers<br />
bid? How can both publishers and advertisers incorporate learning and<br />
optimization, including balancing exploration and exploitation? How do<br />
practical constraints like real-time delivery impact design? How is<br />
automation changing the advertising industry? How will ad auctions and<br />
exchanges evolve in the next decade? How should they evolve?</p>
<p> Papers from a rich set of empirical, experimental, and theoretical<br />
perspectives are invited. Topics of interest for the workshop include<br />
but are not limited to:</p>
<p> * Web search advertising (sponsored search)<br />
 * Banner advertising<br />
 * Ad networks, ad exchanges<br />
 * Comparison shopping<br />
 * Mechanism and market design for advertising<br />
 * Ad targeting and personalization<br />
 * Learning, optimization, and explore/exploit tradeoffs in ad placement<br />
 * Ranking and placement of ads<br />
 * Computational and cognitive constraints<br />
 * Game-theoretic analysis of mechanisms, behaviors, and dynamics<br />
 * Matching algorithms: exact and inexact match<br />
 * Equilibrium characterizations<br />
 * Simulations<br />
 * Laboratory experiments<br />
 * Empirical characterizations<br />
 * Advertiser signaling, collusion<br />
 * Pay for impression, click, and conversion; conversion tracking<br />
 * Campaign optimization; bidding agents; search engine marketing (SEM)<br />
 * Local (geographic) advertising<br />
 * Contextual advertising (e.g., Google AdSense)<br />
 * User satisfaction/defection<br />
 * User incentives and rewards<br />
 * Affiliate model<br />
 * Click fraud detection, measurement, and prevention<br />
 * Price time series analysis<br />
 * Multiattribute and expressive auctions<br />
 * Bidding languages for advertising</p>
<p> We solicit contributions of two types: (1) research contributions,<br />
and (2) position statements. Research contributions should report new<br />
(unpublished) research results or ongoing research.  The workshop<br />
proceedings can be considered non-archival, meaning contributors are<br />
free to publish their results later in archival journals or<br />
conferences.  Research contributions can be up to ten pages long, in<br />
double-column ACM SIG proceedings format:<br />
http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates<br />
Position statements are short descriptions of the authors&#8217; view of how<br />
ad auction research or practice will or should evolve.  Position<br />
statements should be no more than five pages long. Panel discussion<br />
proposals and invited speaker suggestions are also welcome.</p>
<p> The workshop will include a significant portion of invited<br />
presentations along with presentations on accepted research<br />
contributions. There will be time for both organized and open<br />
discussion. Registration will be open to all EC&#8217;08 attendees.</p>
<p> The first three workshops on sponsored search auctions successfully<br />
attracted a wide audience from academia and industry working on<br />
various aspects of web search advertising. Following the footsteps of<br />
the previous workshops, the Fourth Workshop on Ad Auctions strives to<br />
be a venue that helps address challenges in the broader field of<br />
online advertising, by providing opportunities for researchers and<br />
practitioners to interact with each other, stake out positions, and<br />
present their latest research findings. While the first three<br />
workshops focused on web search advertising, we have broadened the<br />
scope this year to include auctions and exchanges for any form of<br />
online advertising.</p>
<p>Submission Instructions<br />
=======================</p>
<p> Research contributions should report new (unpublished) research<br />
results or ongoing research.  The workshop&#8217;s proceedings can be<br />
considered non-archival, meaning contributors are free to publish<br />
their results later in archival journals or conferences. Research<br />
contributions can be up to ten pages long, in double-column ACM SIG<br />
proceedings format:<br />
<a href="http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates">http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates</a><br />
Positions papers and panel discussion proposals are also welcome.</p>
<p> Papers should be submitted electronically using the conference<br />
management system:<br />
<a href="http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=adauctions2008">http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=adauctions2008</a><br />
no later than midnight Hawaii time, May 11, 2008. Authors should also<br />
email the organizing committee ( adauctions2008@yahoogroups.com ) to<br />
indicate that they have submitted a paper to the system.</p>
<p> At least one author of each accepted paper will be expected to attend<br />
and present their findings at the workshop.</p>
<p>Important Dates<br />
===============</p>
<p> May 11, 2008  Submissions due midnight Hawaii time<br />
       a. Submit to:<br />
          <a href="http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=adauctions2008">http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=adauctions2008</a><br />
       b. Notify adauctions2008@yahoogroups.com<br />
 May 23, 2008 Notification of accepted papers<br />
 June 8, 2008 Final copy due</p>
<p>Organizing Committee<br />
==================== </p>
<p> Susan Athey, Harvard University<br />
 Rica Gonen, Yahoo!<br />
 Jason Hartline, Northwestern University<br />
 Aranyak Mehta, Google<br />
 David Pennock, Yahoo!<br />
 Siva Viswanathan, University of Maryland</p>
<p>Program Committee<br />
=================</p>
<p>Gagan Aggarwal, Google<br />
Animesh Animesh, McGill University<br />
Moshe Babaioff, Microsoft<br />
Tilman Borgers, University of Michigan<br />
Max Chickering, Microsoft<br />
Chris Dellarocas, University of Maryland<br />
Ben Edelman,  Harvard University<br />
Jon Feldman, Google<br />
Jane Feng, University of Florida<br />
Slava Galperin, A9<br />
Anindya Ghose, New York University<br />
Kartik Hosanagar, University of Pennsylvania<br />
Kamal Jain, Microsoft<br />
Jim Jansen, University of Pennsylvainia<br />
Sebastien Lahaie, Yahoo!<br />
John O. Ledyard, Caltech<br />
Ying Li, Microsoft<br />
Ilya Lipkind, A9<br />
Preston McAfee, Yahoo!<br />
Chris Meek, Microsoft<br />
John Morgan, University of California Berkeley<br />
Michael Ostrovsky, Stanford University<br />
Abhishek Pani, Efficient Frontier<br />
Martin Pesendorfer, London School of Economics<br />
David Reiley, Yahoo!<br />
Tim Roughgarden, Stanford University<br />
Catherine Tucker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
Rakesh Vohra, Northwestern University</p>
<p>More Information<br />
================</p>
<p> For more information or questions, visit the workshop website:<br />
 <a href="http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/">http://research.yahoo.com/workshops/ad-auctions-2008/</a></p>
<p> or email the organizing committee:<br />
 adauctions2008@yahoogroups.com<br />
</font>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/05/call-for-papers-and-participation-workshop-on-ad-auctions-chicago-july-8-9-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A historic MayDay: The US government&#8217;s call for help on regulating prediction markets</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/02/a-historic-mayday-the-us-governments-call-for-help-on-regulating-prediction-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/02/a-historic-mayday-the-us-governments-call-for-help-on-regulating-prediction-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		
	<category>prediction markets</category>
	<category>commentary</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/02/a-historic-mayday-the-us-governments-call-for-help-on-regulating-prediction-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If ever there was an excuse for me to use the cliché pregnant with possibilities, this is it.
May 1, 2008 could signal a turning point for the prediction markets industry.*
Yesterday, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a request for public comments as they mull over the legal and regulatory status of prediction markets.
I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever there was an excuse for me to use the cliché <em>pregnant with possibilities</em>, this is it.</p>
<p>May 1, 2008 could signal a turning point for the prediction markets industry.*</p>
<p>Yesterday, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) <a href="http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2008/pr5493-08.html">issued a request</a> for public comments as they mull over the legal and regulatory status of prediction markets.</p>
<p>I read the <a href="http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/eventmarkets050108.pdf">Concept Release</a> in detail, and I am happy to report that it is a careful, thoughtful, even scholarly document that reflects a <span style="background-color:yellow;">solid understanding of the goals of prediction markets</span>, and that appears to signal a <span style="background-color:yellow;">real willingness on the part of the CFTC to consider reasonable options and arguments</span>.</p>
<p>In short, this development leaves the optimist in me <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2006/10/17/carving-a-legal-niche-for-prediction-markets-in-the-us/">dreaming of a day</a> in the not so distant future when US companies can try out some truly innovative products.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not often that an <a href="http://www.pmindustry.org/">industry</a> in its infancy cries out for <em>more</em> government oversight. But the CFTC is certainly preferable to the <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2006/10/16/us-gambling-laws-bizarre-illogical-hypocritical-so-whats-legal/">gambling</a> <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2007/07/21/betcha-loses-a-battle-not-the-war/">Gestapo</a>.</p>
<p>Anyone who desires to see more prediction markets in the US, please let the CFTC know what you think!</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>    </td>
<td>*<font size="-2">Or <a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/01/cftc-anouncement/">not</a>.</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/05/02/a-historic-mayday-the-us-governments-call-for-help-on-regulating-prediction-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporting prediction market prices</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/26/reporting-prediction-market-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/26/reporting-prediction-market-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		
	<category>prediction markets</category>
	<category>commentary</category>
	<category>probability</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/26/reporting-prediction-market-prices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters recently ran a story on political prediction markets, quoting prices from intrade and IEM. (Apparently the story was buzzed up to the Yahoo! homepage and made the Drudge Report.)
The reporter phrased prices in terms of the candidates&#8217; percent chance of winning:

Traders &#8230; gave Democratic front-runner Barack Obama an 86 percent chance of being the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuters recently ran a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0835754620080408">story on political prediction markets</a>, quoting prices from <a href="http://intrade.com">intrade</a> and <a href="http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem">IEM</a>. (Apparently the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080408/pl_nm/usa_politics_predictions_dc_1">story</a> was <a href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/">buzzed up</a> to the <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/">Yahoo! homepage</a> and <a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/04/09/prediction-markets-prediction-exchanges/">made the Drudge Report</a>.)</p>
<p>The reporter phrased prices in terms of the candidates&#8217; percent chance of winning:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0835754620080408"><p>
Traders &#8230; gave Democratic front-runner Barack Obama an 86 percent chance of being the Democratic presidential nominee, versus a 12.8 percent for Clinton&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;traders were betting the Democratic nominee would ultimately become president. They gave the Democrat a 59.1 percent chance of winning, versus a 48.8 percent chance for the Republican.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The latter numbers imply an embarrassingly incoherent market, giving the Democrats and Republicans together a 107.9% chance of winning.  <span style="background-color:yellow;">This is almost certainly the result of a typo</span>, since the <a href="http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/common/c_cd.jsp?conDetailID=173054&#038;z=1207768430934">Republican candidate on intrade</a> has not been much above 40 since mid 2007.</p>
<p>Still, typos aside, we know that the last-trade prices of candidates on intrade and IEM often don&#8217;t sum to exactly 100. So how should journalists report prediction market prices?</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Prediction-Markets/msg/0060887ede8ca4af">Byrne Hobart suggests</a> they should stick to something strictly factual like &quot;For $4.00, an investor could purchase a contract which would yield $10.00&quot; if the Republican wins.</p>
<p>I disagree. I believe that phrasing prices as probabilities is desirable. <span style="background-color:yellow;">The general public understands &#8220;percent chance&#8221; without further explanation, and interpreting prices in this way directly aligns with the prediction market industry&#8217;s message.</span></p>
<p>When converting prices to probabilities, is a journalist obligated to normalize them so they sum to 100? Should journalists report last-trade prices or bid-ask spreads or something else?</p>
<p>My inclination is that bid-ask spreads are better. Something like &quot;traders gave the Democrats <a href="http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/common/c_cd.jsp?conDetailID=416491&#038;z=1209145555631"><span style="background-color:yellow;">between a 22 and 30 percent chance of winning the state of Arkansas</span></a>&quot;. These will rarely be inconsistent (otherwise arbitrage is sitting on the table) and the phrasing is still relatively easy to understand.</p>
<p>Avoiding this (admittedly nitpicky) dilemma is another advantage of <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2006/10/30/implementing-hansons-market-maker/">automated market makers like Hanson&#8217;s</a>. The market maker&#8217;s prices always sum to exactly 100, and the bid, ask, and last-trade prices are one and the same. Auction-type mechanisms like intrade&#8217;s can also be <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/02/19/the-right-way-to-implement-a-multi-outcome-prediction-market-linear-programming/">designed better so that prices are automatically kept consistent</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/26/reporting-prediction-market-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A freakonomist takes on Big Weather and, &#8230; stumbles</title>
		<link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/25/a-freakonomist-takes-on-big-weather-and-stumbles/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/25/a-freakonomist-takes-on-big-weather-and-stumbles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pennock</dc:creator>
		
	<category>probability</category>
	<category>fun</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/25/a-freakonomist-takes-on-big-weather-and-stumbles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that even D.I.Y. freakonomists aren&#8217;t sure how to judge probability forecasts.

In measuring precipitation accuracy, the study assumed that if a forecaster predicted a 50 percent or higher chance of precipitation, they were saying it was more likely to rain than not. Less than 50 percent meant it was more likely to not rain. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/how-valid-are-tv-weather-forecasts/">even D.I.Y. freakonomists</a> aren&#8217;t sure <a href="http://blog.oddhead.com/2006/12/26/evaluating-probabilistic-predictions/">how to judge probability forecasts</a>.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/how-valid-are-tv-weather-forecasts/"><p>
In measuring precipitation accuracy, the study assumed that if a forecaster predicted a 50 percent or higher chance of precipitation, they were saying it was more likely to rain than not. Less than 50 percent meant it was more likely to not rain. </p>
<p>That prediction was then compared to whether or not it actually did rain&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/04/25/a-freakonomist-takes-on-big-weather-and-stumbles/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
